Feb 17 2012

Abbott & Costello – Who’s on 1st Routine

Brent Armstrong

COSTELLO: I want to talk about the unemployment rate in America ..

ABBOTT: Good subject. Terrible times. It’s about 9%.

COSTELLO: That many people are out of work?

ABBOTT: No, that’s 16%.

COSTELLO: You just said 9%.

ABBOTT: 9% Unemployed.

COSTELLO: Right 9% out of work.

ABBOTT: No, that’s 16%.

COSTELLO: Okay, so it’s 16% unemployed.

ABBOTT: No, that’s 9%…

COSTELLO: WAIT A MINUTE. Is it 9% or 16%?

ABBOTT: 9% are unemployed. 16% are out of work.

COSTELLO: If you are out of work you are unemployed.

ABBOTT: No, you can’t count the “Out of Work” as the unemployed.  You have to look for work to be unemployed.

COSTELLO: But …. they are out of work!

ABBOTT: No, you miss my point.

COSTELLO: What point?

ABBOTT: Someone who doesn’t look for work, can’t be counted with those who look for work. It wouldn’t be fair.

COSTELLO: To who?

ABBOTT: The unemployed.

COSTELLO: But they are ALL out of work.

ABBOTT: No, the unemployed are actively looking for work… Those who are out of work stopped looking. They gave up. And, if you give up, you are no longer in the ranks of the unemployed.

COSTELLO: So if you’re off the unemployment rolls, that would count as less unemployment?

ABBOTT: Unemployment would go down. Absolutely!

COSTELLO: The unemployment just goes down because you don’t look for work?

ABBOTT: Absolutely it goes down. That’s how you get to 9%. Otherwise it would be 16%. You don’t want to read about 16% unemployment do ya?

COSTELLO: That would be frightening.

ABBOTT: Absolutely.

COSTELLO: Wait, I got a question for you. That means they’re two ways to bring down the unemployment number?

ABBOTT: Two ways is correct.

COSTELLO: Unemployment can go down if someone gets a job?

ABBOTT: Correct.

COSTELLO: And unemployment can also go down if you stop looking for a job?

ABBOTT: Bingo.

COSTELLO: So there are two ways to bring unemployment down, and the easier of the two is to just stop looking for work.

ABBOTT: Now you’re thinking like Obama’s Liberals…

COSTELLO: I don’t even know what I just said!

And now you know why (and how?)

 

Obama is trying to get away with saying unemployment numbers are improving?!?! What a joke… indeed!


Feb 5 2012

Catholic Church vs Obama

Brent Armstrong

Fred Vanley shared the following article with me. It is definitely worth your time in reading. It is not often that we would find ourself in such agreement with the Catholic church; however, when there is this kind of statement being made, it is worthy of my applause…

by Cliff Kinkaid

My Catholic priest, Father Larry Swink, delivered a homily on Sunday that I told him would make headlines. In the toughest sermon I have ever heard from a pulpit, he attacked the Obama Administration as evil, even demonic, and warned of religious persecution ahead. What was also newsworthy about the sermon was that he cited The Washington Post in agreement—not on the subject of the Obama Administration being evil, but on the matter of its abridgment of the constitutional right to freedom of religion.

What is happening is extraordinary and unprecedented. The Catholic Church is in open revolt against the Obama Administration, with Fr. Swink noting from the pulpit that priests across the archdiocese were joining the call on Sunday to rally Catholics to resistance against the U.S. Government. He said we are entering a time of religious persecution and that Catholics and others will have to make a final decision about which side they are on.

The issue is what the Catholic Bishops have called a “literally unconscionable” edict by the Obama Administration demanding that sterilization, abortifacients and contraception be included in virtually all health plans.

At a time when the media are full of reports about who is ahead and behind in the polls, and who will win the next Republican presidential primary, this incredible uprising in the Catholic Church is something that could not only overshadow the political campaign season, but also may have a major impact on the ultimate outcome—if Republicans know how to handle it. This matter goes beyond partisan politics to the growing perception of an unconstitutional Obama Administration assault on religious freedom. To hear the Catholic Bishops and Priests describe it, our constitutional republic and our freedoms hang in the balance.

The administration claims there is a religious exemption in the mandate, but the bishops say it is so narrow that it fails to cover the vast majority of faith-based organizations, including Catholic hospitals, universities and service organizations that help millions every year. “Ironically,” they say, “not even Jesus & his disciples would have qualified.”

The bishops go on, “Now that the Administration has refused to recognize the Constitutional conscience rights of organizations and individuals who oppose the mandate, the bishops are now urging Catholics and others of good will to fight this unprecedented attack on conscience rights and religious liberty.”

Interestingly, The Washington Post, as Father Swink indicated, agrees with the bishops. The paper said, “In this circumstance, requiring a religiously affiliated employer to spend its own money in a way that violates its religious principles does not make an adequate accommodation for those deeply held views. Having recognized the principle of a religious exemption, the administration should have expanded it.”

So why would the administration pick a major fight with the Catholic Church? There are two main reasons. (1) The administration wants to please its progressive and feminist, secular pro-abortion base. (2) The administration believes Catholics are divided on the issue and will ignore their leaders and follow Obama.

Support for the latter explanation comes in the form of the Obama Administration’s efforts to co-opt the Catholic Church, primarily through appointing nominal Catholics to high-level positions in government and keeping funding going to the church for “social justice” causes. Another player in this effort is the hedge-fund billionaire George Soros, an atheist who nevertheless has found groups that are “Catholic in name only” to accept his financial largesse. These groups, including Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, are designed to give the impression that Catholics are less concerned about issues like stopping abortion and protecting the sanctity of traditional marriage than passing government health care. The Obama/Soros gamble may be backfiring.

It’s true that the bishops went along with Obama’s health care scheme, even lobbying on its behalf. But now they seem to be realizing that the plan was a Trojan Horse designed to force population control measures on the people of the United States. It will be difficult for the bishops to continue working with the administration on other issues, like immigration. They have drawn a line in the sand. They cannot back down.

Father Larry Swink of Jesus The Divine Word Catholic Church in Huntingtown, Maryland, is not alone in his tough language. Pittsburgh Bishop David A. Zubik posted a letter on the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh’s website that said, “It is really hard to believe that it happened. It comes like a slap in the face. The Obama administration has just told the Catholics of the United States, ‘To Hell with you!’ There is no other way to put it.” He added, “This whole process of mandating these guidelines undermines the democratic process itself. In this instance, the mandate declares pregnancy a disease, forces a culture of contraception and abortion on society, all while completely bypassing the legislative process.”

You know it’s serious when the bishops are talking about heaven and hell.

Indeed, Fr. Swink opened his discussion of what he described as the evil nature of the Obama Administration by reading from scripture about Jesus casting out demons. He saw the order on health care coverage as the start of religious persecution. The congregation joined him in calls of “Amen” when he challenged them to stand tall with the church.

You cannot expect the secular Washington Post to go along with such rhetoric. But even its liberal editorial writer saw the ramifications of the health care order, perhaps anticipating the confrontation that we now see developing. From the point of view of this liberal paper, the Obama Administration is not only undermining religious freedom but risking a major backlash to its overall “progressive” agenda and even a second term in office.

Some may see this battle as just another church-state dust-up that will be resolved through litigation. But when apocalyptic imagery is used, such as what I heard at my church on Sunday, one must wonder if there is an awakening on the part of the Catholic community and if there is something else going on here besides politics as usual. In short, is the Catholic Church beginning to finally recognize the real nature of the Obama Administration?

Cliff Kincaid is the Director of the AIM Center for Investigative Journalism, and can be contacted at cliff.kincaid@aim.org.


Feb 4 2012

Ants vs Grasshoppers

Brent Armstrong

The new ANT and the GRASSHOPPER, Two Versions:

OL D VERSION:   The ANT works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.  The GRASSHOPPER thinks the ANT is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.  Come winter, the ANT is warm  and well-fed.   The GRASSHOPPER has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.

MORAL OF THE OLD VERSION:

Be responsible for yourself!

MODERN  VERSION:   The  ANT works hard  in the withering heat and the rain all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The GRASSHOPPER thinks the ANT is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the shivering GRASSHOPPER calls a press conference and demands to know why the ANT should be allowed to be warm and well- fed while he is cold and starving.  CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, and ABC show up to  provide pictures of the shivering GRASSHOPPER next to a video of the ANT in his comfortable home with a table filled with food.  America is stunned by the sharp contrast.

How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor GRASSHOPPER is allowed to suffer so?   Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the GRASSHOPPER and everybody cries when they sing, ‘It’s Not  Easy Being Green…’   Occupy the Anthill stages a demonstration in front of the ANT’s house where the news stations film the SEIU group singing, “We shall overcome.”  Then Rev. Jeremiah Wright  has the group kneel down to pray for the GRASSHOPPER’s sake, while he criticizes the ANT.

President Obama condemns the ANT and blames President Bush 43, President Bush 41, President Reagan, Christopher Columbus, and the  Pope for the GRASSHOPPER’s plight.   Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid  exclaim in an interview with Larry  King that the ANT has gotten rich off the back of the GRASSHOPPER, and both call for an immediate tax hike on the ANT to make him pay his fair share.

Finally, the EEOC drafts  the Economic Equity &  Anti-Grasshopper Act  retroactive to the beginning of  the summer. The ANT is fined for failing to hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the Government Green Czar and given to the GRASSHOPPER.

The story ends as we see the GRASSHOPPER and his free-loading friends finishing up the last bits of the ANT’s food while the government house he is in, which, as you recall, just happens to be the ANT’s old house,  crumbles around them because the grasshopper doesn’t maintain it.  The ANT has disappeared in the snow, never to be seen again.  The GRASSHOPPER is found dead in a drug related incident, and the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the ramshackle, once prosperous and peaceful, neighborhood.   The entire Nation collapses bringing the rest of the free world with it.

MORAL OF THE STORY:  

Be careful how you vote in 2012.

We need more ANT’s!


Jan 16 2012

Revival Update

Brent Armstrong

Evangelist Mike Shrock preached two messages yesterday from I Peter 1:23 – 2:3 and it was so thrilling to see the Lord work among our church family. On Saturday we had 58 men meet at 7:00 a.m. for prayer; at 9:30 a.m. we had another group meet for door-to-door soulwinning. At one of those houses, two of our ladies invited a family to our services. On Sunday, that family came to church and both the husband and wife walked the aisle at invitation time to trust Christ as their personal Lord and Savior. What an absolute joy to see people’s lives changed by the Gospel message of Jesus Christ. We had eleven first-time visiting families yesterday. Visitation and personal invitations still work.

Ruben Murillo Jr is preaching in our Spanish ministry and the feedback from yesterday was very encouraging from our Spanish congregation. We ALL need to be revived and it is uplifting to know that God’s Word and His Holy Spirit are still at work in this year 2012.

Tonight we will continue with our Revival services at 7:00 p.m. in both the English and Spanish churches.


Nov 20 2011

More than a Clever Piece of Art

Brent Armstrong