Whose to Blame?
By The United West On September 19, 2012
The full responsibility for the protection of our foreign embassies falls, by law, on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton directly and her boss President Obama.
USLegal.com explains, “Generally, embassies are considered as an extension of the home country’s territory…The embassy premises and the staff are protected under the concept of diplomatic immunity by the host country.”
Any attack on a United States Embassy or Consulate is considered a direct attack on the United States of America, and considered an act of war. Those foreign countries who allow our Embassies and Consulates in their countries agree to provide security to those said embassies and consulates. Foreign diplomacy has operated under these rules since the first American embassy was established in Tangier in 1777.
22 USC § 4865 – Security requirement for United States diplomatic facilities falls squarely on the shoulders of Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State. Section (a)(1)(B) states,
(B) Security Environment Threat List
The Security Environment Threat List shall contain a section that addresses potential acts of international terrorism against United States diplomatic facilities based on threat identification criteria that emphasize the threat of transnational terrorism and include the local security environment, host government support, and other relevant factors such as cultural realities. Such plan shall be reviewed and updated every six months.
United State Code, 22 USC 4865 says Hillary Clinton’s authority under section (a)(1)(B) is not delegable. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is ultimately responsible for the security environment at the Benghazi U.S. Consulate that resulted in the deaths of four Americans.
Secretary of State Clinton owes our country an explanation why the American Consulate in Benghazi Libya had NO marine guard, bulletproof glass, reinforced doors, safe rooms, and why many intelligence estimates went unheeded foreshadowing the possibility of protests or riots at the Benghazi facility on 9/11/2012.
On 9/13/12 CNN Secretary of State Clinton made some disturbing statements to Moroccan officials in Washington illustrating a profound lack of knowledge of our Islamist enemies who perpetrated these attacks. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said,
“To us, to me personally, this video is disgusting and reprehensible. It appears to have a deeply cynical purpose to denigrate a great religion and provoke rage. But as we said yesterday, there is no justification — none at all — for responding to this video with violence.” Hillary Clinton
The Video False Flag
The video in question is Innocence of Muslims
The video was first released over 3 months ago and nobody went Jihad. So why did it resurface on 9/11/12? In order to have a successful attack one must agitate the Muslim masses. The Imams and terrorist groups all over the Middle East started talking up this American made movie ridiculing Islam’s Prophet Muhammad, in violation of Shariah blasphemy laws.
Most every Middle Eastern Muslim is aware of Islamic blasphemy laws. If a Muslim or non-Muslim accidentally or with intent insults Islam or Muhammad, he or she could be killed under Shariah Islamiyya laws.